Someone else is currently editing this document
Only one person can work on a document at a time
Diary 4: January - December 1937 Item 81
TRANSCRIPTION
Left page
The French and the British, the Yugoslav
and the Russian, the Swede and others try
to shake him. An impression which I think
was a wrong one was given to his action by
simultaneous proposal from Austria, Hungary
and Portugal, the pro-Italian group. Eventually
he abstained from voting for or against,
which ensured the passage of the resolution,
but said he would make a declaration in the
Assembly explaining his attitude. He told me
afterwards he was anxious not to identify himself
with any group. He thought that the risk
contained in the paragraph was in any case bad
policy and he had not been consulted about the
paragraph which said that he would reconsider
his Government's attitude. I think that he
may have been technically on good grounds,
but I doubt very much from the political
point of view.
The difficulty about de Valera really
arises from the fact that for about 11 months
of the year he is immersed either in home
affairs or Anglo-Irish affairs and he comes
to Geneva without a back-ground such as other
Foreign Ministers who have been doing nothing
else. On this particular point he has of
course the question of home opinion, catholic
influence being mainly against the Republicans
and the opposition having exploited his non-
intervention decisions in an unscrupulous way
considering that it was a question of important
foreign policy on which any Government in
Ireland would have acted similarly.
Amongst the Delegation I think John
Hearne really is the most intelligent and
best balanced; Mickie Rynn, who fortunately
has little or no influence, allows violently
anti-red which affects his judgement; Cremins
knows much more, but is not really courageous.
Right page
De Valera's speech the next day at te
Assembly helped to make his views
clearer, but the general effect remained.
Two or three days later came Roosevelt's
Chicago speech - saying isolation
impossible even for U.S.A.,
dividing the Powers into aggressive and
pacific, etc. The most important
and encouraging political event
for a long time. Even if it
should not be followed by
very concrete action, it is a
clear warning to Germany & Italy
as well as Japan. And agreement with L/N action on China.
What a pity that, for once,
Dev. had not followed the American
line.
Language(s) of Transcription
LOCATION
Gdańsk (Poland) (54.3612, 18.5499)
Story Location
ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT
Document Date
Document Type
Document Description
Language of Description
Keywords
External Web Resources
STORY INFORMATION
Title
Diary 4: January - December 1937
Creator
Lester | Seán | 1888-1959
Contributor
Seán Lester
Lester, Seán, 1888-1959
Date
21 January 1937-?28 December 1937
Type
Text
Rights
This collection has been digitised and made available by Dublin City University Library. Please credit Dublin City University Library when using these images, creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Language
eng
Identifier
#98818g003
LandingPage
https://www.europeana.eu/item/707/_98818g003Country
Ireland
DatasetName
707__Dublin_City_University
Begin
1936-05-01
End
1937-02-28
Language
en
Created
2022-03-23T16:13:34.244Z
2022-03-23T16:13:37.054271Z
2022-03-23T16:13:37.054820Z
Story Description
Handwritten and typed diary entries relating to Lester's time as Deputy Secretary General of the League of Nations in Geneva. Includes newspaper cuttings and a programme for a St Andrew's Day dinner, hosted by the Caledonian Society of Switzerland on 4 December 1937 (at which Lester was a speaker).
TRANSCRIPTION
LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
PEOPLE
STORY INFO
TUTORIAL
Left page
The French and the British, the Yugoslav
and the Russian, the Swede and others try
to shake him. An impression which I think
was a wrong one was given to his action by
simultaneous proposal from Austria, Hungary
and Portugal, the pro-Italian group. Eventually
he abstained from voting for or against,
which ensured the passage of the resolution,
but said he would make a declaration in the
Assembly explaining his attitude. He told me
afterwards he was anxious not to identify himself
with any group. He thought that the risk
contained in the paragraph was in any case bad
policy and he had not been consulted about the
paragraph which said that he would reconsider
his Government's attitude. I think that he
may have been technically on good grounds,
but I doubt very much from the political
point of view.
The difficulty about de Valera really
arises from the fact that for about 11 months
of the year he is immersed either in home
affairs or Anglo-Irish affairs and he comes
to Geneva without a back-ground such as other
Foreign Ministers who have been doing nothing
else. On this particular point he has of
course the question of home opinion, catholic
influence being mainly against the Republicans
and the opposition having exploited his non-
intervention decisions in an unscrupulous way
considering that it was a question of important
foreign policy on which any Government in
Ireland would have acted similarly.
Amongst the Delegation I think John
Hearne really is the most intelligent and
best balanced; Mickie Rynn, who fortunately
has little or no influence, allows violently
anti-red which affects his judgement; Cremins
knows much more, but is not really courageous.
Right page
De Valera's speech the next day at te
Assembly helped to make his views
clearer, but the general effect remained.
Two or three days later came Roosevelt's
Chicago speech - saying isolation
impossible even for U.S.A.,
dividing the Powers into aggressive and
pacific, etc. The most important
and encouraging political event
for a long time. Even if it
should not be followed by
very concrete action, it is a
clear warning to Germany & Italy
as well as Japan. And agreement with L/N action on China.
What a pity that, for once,
Dev. had not followed the American
line.
- English (English)
Left page
The French and the British, the Yugoslav
and the Russian, the Swede and others try
to shake him. An impression which I think
was a wrong one was given to his action by
simultaneous proposal from Austria, Hungary
and Portugal, the pro-Italian group. Eventually
he abstained from voting for or against,
which ensured the passage of the resolution,
but said he would make a declaration in the
Assembly explaining his attitude. He told me
afterwards he was anxious not to identify himself
with any group. He thought that the risk
contained in the paragraph was in any case bad
policy and he had not been consulted about the
paragraph which said that he would reconsider
his Government's attitude. I think that he
may have been technically on good grounds,
but I doubt very much from the political
point of view.
The difficulty about de Valera really
arises from the fact that for about 11 months
of the year he is immersed either in home
affairs or Anglo-Irish affairs and he comes
to Geneva without a back-ground such as other
Foreign Ministers who have been doing nothing
else. On this particular point he has of
course the question of home opinion, catholic
influence being mainly against the Republicans
and the opposition having exploited his non-
intervention decisions in an unscrupulous way
considering that it was a question of important
foreign policy on which any Government in
Ireland would have acted similarly.
Amongst the Delegation I think John
Hearne really is the most intelligent and
best balanced; Mickie Rynn, who fortunately
has little or no influence, allows violently
anti-red which affects his judgement; Cremins
knows much more, but is not really courageous.
Right page
De Valera's speech the next day at te
Assembly helped to make his views
clearer, but the general effect remained.
Two or three days later came Roosevelt's
Chicago speech - saying isolation
impossible even for U.S.A.,
dividing the Powers into aggressive and
pacific, etc. The most important
and encouraging political event
for a long time. Even if it
should not be followed by
very concrete action, it is a
clear warning to Germany & Italy
as well as Japan. And agreement with L/N action on China.
What a pity that, for once,
Dev. had not followed the American
line.
Language(s) of Transcription
English Translation
Transcription History
Left page The French and the British, the Yugoslav and the Russian, the Swede and others try to shake him. An impression which I think was a wrong one was given to his action by simultaneous proposal from Austria, Hungary and Portugal, the pro-Italian group. Eventually he abstained from voting for or against, which ensured the passage of the resolution, but said he would make a declaration in the Assembly explaining his attitude. He told me afterwards he was anxious not to identify himself with any group. He thought that the risk contained in the paragraph was in any case bad policy and he had not been consulted about the paragraph which said that he would reconsider his Government's attitude. I think that he may have been technically on good grounds, but I doubt very much from the political point of view. The difficulty about de Valera really arises from the fact that for about 11 months of the year he is immersed either in home affairs or Anglo-Irish affairs and he comes to Geneva without a back-ground such as other Foreign Ministers who have been doing nothing else. On this particular point he has of course the question of home opinion, catholic influence being mainly against the Republicans and the opposition having exploited his non- intervention decisions in an unscrupulous way considering that it was a question of important foreign policy on which any Government in Ireland would have acted similarly. Amongst the Delegation I think John Hearne really is the most intelligent and best balanced; Mickie Rynn, who fortunately has little or no influence, allows violently anti-red which affects his judgement; Cremins knows much more, but is not really courageous. Right page De Valera's speech the next day at te Assembly helped to make his views clearer, but the general effect remained. Two or three days later came Roosevelt's Chicago speech - saying isolation impossible even for U.S.A., dividing the Powers into aggressive and pacific, etc. The most important and encouraging political event for a long time. Even if it should not be followed by very concrete action, it is a clear warning to Germany & Italy as well as Japan. And agreement with L/N action on China. What a pity that, for once, Dev. had not followed the American line.
Left page The French and the British, the Yugoslav and the Russian, the Swede and others try to shake him. An impression which I think was a wrong one was given to his action by simultaneous proposal from Austria, Hungary and Portugal, the pro-Italian group. Eventually he abstained from voting for or against, which ensured the passage of the resolution, but said he would make a declaration in the Assembly explaining his attitude. He told me afterwards he was anxious not to identify himself with any group. He thought that the risk contained in the paragraph was in any case bad policy and he had not been consulted about the paragraph which said that he would reconsider his Government's attitude. I think that he may have been technically on good grounds, but I doubt very much from the political point of view. The difficulty about de Valera really arises from the fact that for about 11 months of the year he is immersed either in home affairs or Anglo-Irish affairs and he comes to Geneva without a back-ground such as other Foreign Ministers who have been doing nothing else. On this particular point he has of course the question of home opinion, catholic influence being mainly against the Republicans and the opposition having exploited his non- intervention decisions in an unscrupulous way considering that it was a question of important foreign policy on which any Government in Ireland would have acted similarly. Amongst the Delegation I think John Hearne really is the most intelligent and best balanced; Mickie Rynn, who fortunately has little or no influence, allows violently anti-red which affects his judgement; Cremins knows much more, but is not really courageous.
English Translation
Automatically Identified Enrichments
Verify Automatically Identified Enrichments
Verify Automatically Identified Locations
Verify Automatically Identified Persons
Enrichment Mode
Edit your workspace view by using the top-right menu.
You can have the white Activity Panel docked to the right (default) , to the bottom , or as an independent overlay . If you just want to view the image, you can hide the panel using the minimise button , and then re-open it with the pen button. Adjust the size and position of your Activity Panel according to your preferences.
You enrich documents by following a step-by-step process.
Make sure you regularly save your enrichments in each step to avoid the risk of losing your work.
Step 1: Transcription
To start a transcription, select the transcription tab at the top menu of the Activity Panel. Click inside the box underneath the heading TRANSCRIPTION and start writing your transcription. When needed, use the toolbar to format your text and to add special characters and tables. A guide to the transcription toolbar is available in the Formatting section of this tutorial.
Identify the language(s) of the text using the dropdown list under the transcription box. You can select multiple languages at once.
If the item has no text to transcribe, tick the checkbox ‘No Text’.
Once you have finished your transcription, click SAVE.
Step 2: Description
You can add a description to the item underneath the Transcription section.
The first task is to identify what type of document the item is: a handwritten or printed document, a postcard, photo, drawing and/or part of a diary. Tick the category which best applies to the item. Multiple categories can be selected at once.
The second task is to write a description of the contents. Click inside the box underneath the heading DESCRIPTION. Here, you can write what the item is, what it is about, and specify the images and objects that appear in the item.
Identify the language of the description text that you wrote using the dropdown list underneath. You can only select one language.
Once you have finished your description, click SAVE.
Step 3: Location
If you find a location mentioned or recognise a place in the item, you can create a geotag and pin it to the item map. Multiple locations can be attached to the item. To tag locations, select the tagging tab at the top menu of the Activity Panel. Click the plus next to the heading LOCATIONS. Type the location into the search bar and select the result that best applies. A new pin will be placed into the map. The location name should be a clear georeference, e.g. a country, city or address. Make adjustments to the location name if necessary. You can also adjust the position of the pin by dragging it on the map. If you want to add further details to the location, you can write a (short) description. This could include extra information about the geotag (e.g. the building name or a significant event that took place at the location) or the relevance of the place to the item (e.g. the hometown of the author). You can also add a Wikidata reference to link the location to a stable source. Search for the reference using the Wikidata fields. Once you have finished your location tag, click SAVE. You can find the place(s) tagged to the item in grey at the bottom of the Location(s) section.Step 4: Tagging
Below the Locations section is the Tagging section, where you can add the following annotations:
Document Date:Here, you can add dates that correspond to the item. This could include the dates mentioned in the text (e.g. in diary pages), the date of a related historical event (e.g. the end of WWI), or when the item was created (e.g. from a dated signature on an illustration). You can either define this as a single date or as a longer time frame.
To tag dates to the item, write the start and end dates in DD/MM/YYYY format in the fields or select the dates by clicking on the calendar.
If you only have one date to add, insert the same date into both start and end fields.
If you don’t know the exact days, you can also tag the date on the scale of months (MM/YYYY) or years (YYYY).
Once you have finished your date tag, click SAVE DATE.
People:People mentioned as creators or subjects in the item can also be tagged. Depending on the information you might have, you can enter the person’s first and last names, as well as their dates of birth and death. There is also the option to write a short description of the person, explaining who they are or their relevance to the item, e.g. the person’s occupation or their relation to another tagged person.
Multiple people can be tagged to one item.
Once you have finished your person tag, click SAVE.
Keywords:Here, you can freely add keywords related to the topic and content of the item. This could include particular themes (e.g. art, music, war), subjects (e.g. children, cooking, France), or particular historical affiliations (e.g. 20th century, Austro-Hungarian Empire, Fall of the Iron Curtain).
Multiple keywords can be added and they can be written in any language.
Write your keyword tag into the field and click SAVE.
Other Sources:External websites with information about the item’s content can be linked here. This could include links to further data about a person mentioned, a particular historical event or links to digital versions of newspapers that appear in photos or clippings in a notebook.
To add a link, click the plus next to the heading ‘Other Sources’. Enter the URL into the Link field, and write a short description of this link in the Additional Description field.
Multiple links can be tagged to one item.
Once you have finished your tag, click SAVE.
Step 5: Mark for Review
Once you have saved your contribution, the task will automatically change to the Edit status. If you think the task is finished, you can mark it for review. Note that you have to be at Runner level or above to do this (see: Miles and Levels). Click on the yellow circle next to the section heading and select Review in the list that appears. The task now needs to go under Review by another volunteer.Formatting
Use the toolbar to format your Transcription text or to add extra details to it.
You can format your text using the various styles and alignment tools:
Use bold for headings, and italics, underline and 
button to remove any formatting changes.Review
All enrichments need to be edited and reviewed by more than one volunteer to ensure that they are as accurate as possible.
Only Sprinters and Champions can edit tasks in the Review stage and mark them as Complete. (see: Miles and Levels)
You can review a task (Transcription, Description, Locations, or Tagging) when the circle next to the heading is coloured orange .
During the review process, pay close attention to the following requirements:
-
- Transcription: The complete text in the item has been properly transcribed and the transcription is formatted as accurately as possible. The correct language(s) are selected and the transcription contains no missing or unclear icons.
-
- Description: The description is accurate and detailed (especially items without text to transcribe, e.g. photos), and the appropriate categories have been ticked.
-
- Location(s): All locations have been correctly tagged. The location name is accurate and matches the coordinates and the pin on the map. The description is clear and concise, and the Wikidata reference (if any) is correct.
-
- Tagging: Document dates are completed and as precise as possible. All mentioned people are tagged and their data is correct. All added keywords are applicable to the item, and other sources have accurate information and functioning links.
Completion Statuses
| GREY |
| 1. NOT STARTED |
| Tasks have not been started. |
| YELLOW |
| 2. EDIT MODE |
| Tasks have been started, but not yet finished. Additions and edits can still be made. |
| ORANGE |
| 3. REVIEW |
| Tasks are finished, but need final review by Sprinter or Champion transcribers. |
| GREEN |
| 4. COMPLETED |
| Tasks have been fully completed and reviewed. No further changes need to be made. |
Miles and Levels
Transcribathon is a competitive marathon. You do not enrich documents alone, but compete and work with other volunteers to ensure the quality of your work. When you first create a Transcribathon account, you only have the ability to start and edit tasks. The more you enrich documents, the closer you become to advancing to a higher level, which can unlock abilities like reviewing and completing tasks.| Level | Abilities |
|---|---|
| Trainee | Basic abilities: start and edit tasks |
| Runner | Basic abilities, mark finished tasks for review |
| Sprinter | All Runner abilities, mark reviewed annotations as completed |
| Champion | All Sprinter abilities, mark reviewed transcriptions as completed |
| Tasks | Miles Received |
|---|---|
| Transcription | 1 Mile for every 300 characters transcribed |
| Description | 1 Mile for every 5 Descriptions added |
| Location | 1 Mile for every 5 Locations added |
| Tagging | 1 Mile for every 5 Tags added |
| Reviewing | 1 Mile for every 10 items marked as complete |
